Your Questions About Stocks And Bonds 2012

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link

Charles asks…

History Proves Immovable Truth of Socialism?

The crisis of capitalism is getting serious in all aspects.

Working people throughout the world have turned out in the struggle to break the chains of capital.

The working masses’ struggle, staged against capitalism all at once across the world on Oct. 15 and 16, was the biggest organized one unprecedented in history of capitalism spanning more than 300 years. Taking part in the struggle were millions of people from all walks of life in more than 1 500 cities in 80 odd countries.

This struggle was erupted at Wall Street in Manhattan of New York in the United States, the heart of the capitalist economy and a synonym for monopolistic capital. Under the slogan of “Occupy Wall Street!” the protestors set up tents outside a stock exchange in New York to go into an action of protest. This turned in a twinkle to a chain movement across the U.S.

The Occupy Wall St movement was an eruption of the exploited classes’ pent-up wrath at the exploiters. It was also an expression of the will to remove the stronghold of capitalism as a whole which brings only exploitation, oppression, unemployment and poverty to the popular masses.

The protesters are now expanding their ranks after setting forth such slogans clearer in nature as “equality, democracy and revolution”.

Ruling quarters in the U.S. are crying in distress that the “class struggle has been launched.”

The U.S. chief executive formally recognized that this is a manifestation of feeling of frustration toward the U.S. society.

The American protestors set October 15 as “day of international movement”, calling on the working people the world over to respond to it.

In response to this call anti-capitalist demos took place all at once in Britain, Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Belgium, Australia, Japan, Philippines, Taiwan, etc. on October 15 and 16. Their participants demanded final end to poverty and economic inequality, chanting such slogans as “Reject capitalism!” and “Give us jobs!”

In south Korea more than 400 civic and public organizations and workers’ organizations launched protest, chanting “Occupy Seoul!”

These unprecedented actions of the working masses in capitalist countries are attributable to the extremely acute socio-class contradictions created after the outbreak of the global financial crisis in 2007.

The capitalist market economy is now on the point of total bankruptcy, embroiled in a new financial panic by protracted economic crisis.

There happened an unprecedented situation in which stock fell hard all at once at securities markets in various parts of the world. The situation was attributable to the unprecedented state debts in the U.S. and Europe caused by the serious financial economic crisis.

According to data, European banks, which bought national bonds issued by Eurozone countries suffering from the debt crisis, may sustain losses of 300 billion Euros in maximum.

As regards the gloomy monetary situation in Western countries the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said that the capitalist economy would not escape from the stagnation not only in 2011 but in 2012.

The facts show that the capitalist market economy is steadily falling down into the maw of total bankruptcy due to its anarchy and spontaneity.

There is no other way out of the present crisis of capitalism but to remove its system to the full. Capitalism is vanishing from the stage of history since it has served to exploit the people and forsaken them.

The Western countries can never get rid of the vicious cycle of crisis with any means as long as the capitalist market economy is left intact.

Foreign news reports say that the impact by financial and debt crisis is bringing to Europe’s party politics and ideological trend of its society the most serious change since the end of the Cold War.

In Latin America many countries more strongly call for rejecting the capitalist market economy and taking to the road of socialism and leftist governments’ influence is growing stronger with each passing day.

With the passage of time the capitalist corruptness and falsity are brought to bolder relief and illusion about capitalism vanishes like a bubble by the rapid current.

The idea reflecting the desire of humankind to live and develop in an independent way has become more vital. The truth of socialism is clearly evidenced in a new historic environment in the 21st century.

The future of mankind is ensured by socialism based on science.

Invincible is socialism belonging to the Korean people, the popular masses and the world people.

financi4 answers:

Nice piece of Propaganda, sadly quite deluded. At the same time!! With to some days to a week hiatus, but that’s not important and most of these spin off ‘Occupy’ and Indignados (which existed before ‘Occupy’ 186 vs 61 days) groups are rather small.

Thomas asks…

While Republicans whine over the economy the rest of us are doing better,cant they see that Obamanomics works?

A Bloomberg national poll in March found that Americans, by an almost 2-to-1 margin, believe the economy has gotten worse rather than better during the past year. The Market begs to differ. All of the financial indexes has turned resoundingly positive. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is up more than 74 percent from its recessionary low in March 2009. Corporate bonds have been rallying for a year. Commodity prices have surged. International currency markets have been bullish on the dollar for months, raising it by almost 10 percent since Nov. 25 against a basket of six major currencies. Housing prices have stabilized. Mortgage rates are low. This is a testament to the fiscal policies of the Obama team. When will the Republicans remove their blinders of hatred towards the President and see that his policies have proved to be helpful to the economy? I wonder what they will run on in 2012 when the economy is booming and none of it from any of their help.

financi4 answers:

Obamanomics does not work. Before he took over, unemployment was 5%. After he took over, unemployment is 9.7%. And if you count the number of people who have given up looking for work the unemployment rate is about 16%. Foreclosures are up. The deficit is balloning.

What exactly is working?

Paul asks…

why is the percent so different on 401k between the different choices? such as walmart stock is a lot lower %?

These are all my choices when picking which ones I want for my 401k! I do not understand why the walmart one is so much lower percent wise than the others? I have never changed mine and I have it all in the my-retirement 2040 fund plus I own 30 shares of walmart which I buy 2 shares bi-weekly now! I just want to know why the bond or the funds and trusts seem to out perform the walmart stock and is this normal? I have came to this page and it is always like this! Why would anyone want to pick any of the lowe ones even if they were getting ready to retire? Seems to me I would want my money in the 2040 funds or higher so my money could do better!

Fund inception date/ gross expense ratio/ month YTD

EQUITY/STOCK

BLACKROCK RUSSELL 1000 INDX TR08/28/20090.04%3.12%12.88%
Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Average2.77%12.43%
BLACKROCK RUSSELL 2000 INDX TR08/28/20090.07%2.57%12.40%
Lipper Small-Cap Core Funds Average2.11%11.99%
DAVIS NY VENTURE TRUST08/28/20090.41%2.46%11.47%
Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Average2.77%12.43%
INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUND08/28/20090.47%-0.17%10.32%
Lipper International Large-Cap Growth
Funds Average0.23%12.54%
RAINIER LARGE CAP GROWTH 306/10/20100.57%3.69%16.84%
Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Average3.06%15.62%
SMALL MID CAP VALUE FUND01/06/20120.64%1.31%N/A
TBC SMID CAP GROWTH TRUST08/28/20090.61%1.70%15.29%
Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Average2.24%14.20%

WAL MART STORES INC 1N/AN/A4.28%3.09%
BOND/FIXED INCOME

BOND FUND08/28/20090.30%-0.33%2.43%
Lipper Large-Cap Value Funds Average2.76%11.99%
MONEY MARKET/STABLE VALUE

FFI PREMIER INSTITUTIONAL FUND 2
7-Day Yield: 0.18%01/27/19970.16%0.01%0.04%
Lipper Institutional Money Market Funds Average0.01%0.02%
ALLOCATION FUNDS

MYRETIREMENT 2000 FUND09/04/20090.30%0.24%5.14%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2010 Funds Average0.50%5.77%
MYRETIREMENT 2005 FUND09/04/20090.30%0.24%5.39%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2010 Funds Average0.50%5.77%
MYRETIREMENT 2010 FUND09/04/20090.31%0.39%5.79%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2010 Funds Average0.50%5.77%
MYRETIREMENT 2015 FUND09/04/20090.31%0.47%6.45%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2015 Funds Average0.58%6.35%
MYRETIREMENT 2020 FUND09/04/20090.31%0.70%7.19%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2020 Funds Average0.70%7.29%
MYRETIREMENT 2025 FUND09/04/20090.31%0.85%7.91%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2025 Funds Average0.96%8.71%
MYRETIREMENT 2030 FUND09/04/20090.32%0.99%8.72%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2030 Funds Average1.07%9.34%
MYRETIREMENT 2035 FUND09/04/20090.32%1.14%9.55%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2030+ Funds Average1.29%10.38%

*MYRETIREMENT 2040 FUND09/04/20090.31%1.29%10.25%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2040 Funds Average1.29%10.57%

MYRETIREMENT 2045 FUND09/04/20090.31%1.36%10.59%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2045 Funds Average1.40%11.39%
MYRETIREMENT 2050 FUND09/04/20090.31%1.29%10.72%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2050+ Funds Average1.42%11.16%
MYRETIREMENT 2055 FUND09/04/20090.32%1.29%10.73%
Lipper Mixed-Asset Target 2050+ Funds Average1.42%11.16%

financi4 answers:

You’re comparing managed funds with a pure equity. With managed funds, the main premise is portfolio construction to control risk and to benefit from a market downturn as well as a market improvement.

The effect of portfolio balance is essentially the adage of buy low, sell high. Ben Graham advocates a 45% equity, 55% bond portfolio and recommends never going below 25% and never above 80% equity. Markowitz says that a 25% equity portfolio is the safest, safer than a 100% bond portfolio, that 50/50 is the same risk as 100% bond portfolio and that with increasing risk, the incremental gains are less ad less. Claude Shannon at MIT demonstrated that a 50/50 mix between a share represented by a random walk ( Brownian motion ) and cash is the ideal. The usual guidance is to go from aggressive such as 80% or higher equity when you start to conservative 25% equity when you retire and this is what the targeted funds with a target date work. The premise of the varying levels of risk is that if you are continuing to invest a set sum from your paycheck each month, that contribution to your portfolio is as if you are holding a bond, the value of this “bond” can even be calculated with an appropriate market rate, perhaps the historical return of your portfolio or the bond yields of your company as you can’t really sell your job and the security of your job is only as good as that of your company. This means that if you have a lot of years of continuing contributions from your salary, you can invest more heavily in stocks.

To envision rebalancing, imagine a 50/50 portfolio of $1,000 between a stock symbolized by a random walk and cash. That would start as $500 / $500, if the stock should drop in half, you would have $250 / $500 so you would buy $125 of stock to rebalance to $375 / $375, should the stock return to it’s original price, you would have $750 / $375 for a portfolio of $1,125 while the stock has essentially stayed the say. Had the stock doubled and then halved, you would also have a portfolio of $1,125.

Bonds are contractual agreements to give you a return, unless the company defaults on the bonds, you will receive the returns specified. There is an interest rate risk as a bond can only be sold if it is competitive with other bond of similar risk therefore if newer bond are available at a higher risk, the seller must discount the bond price so that the yield is the same.

An investment in Walmart will benefit you by the profits distributed as dividends or by the growth of the business for the profits that are re-invested instead of distributed.

Note that when you have multiple annual rates, your average rate over those years is given by the geometric mean. For example, the returns of 0.04%, 3.12% and 12.88% gives you an average of 5.20% not the 5.35% most people would think.

Ken asks…

Accounting Please Help! :)?

1. During 2012, Victoria Group: (1) received cash of $5,000 billed to a customer in 2011; (2) earned $20,000 of net income; (3) paid interest of $6,000 on a corporate bond issued; (4) paid dividends of $8,000 to its stockholders; (5) borrowed $40,000 from a local bank; and (6) purchased its own shares of common stock for $10,000. What is Victoria Group’s cash flow from financing activities in 2012?

a. $40,000.
b. $30,000.
c. $22,000.
d. $16,000.

2. In preparing a statement of cash flows under the indirect method, an increase in accounts payable would be reported as a(n):

a. Addition to net income in the operating activities section.
b. Deduction from net income in the operating activities section.
c. Financing activity.
d. Investing activity.

3. Which of the following is NOT a correct practice when adjusting net income to net operating cash flows?

a. Subtract depreciation expense.
b. Add losses on sales of assets.
c. Subtract increase in Accounts Receivable.
d. Add increase in Accounts Payable.

4. Which of the following statements is true?

a. Investment in another company’s common stock is classified as a cash outflow from financing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.
b. Repayment of long-term debt is classified as a cash outflow from investing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.
c. Losses on the sale of long-term assets are an adjustment reported in the operating activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows under the indirect method.
d. Dividends paid are classified as a cash outflow from operating activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.

Thanks is advance! But I will say it again for answers!

financi4 answers:

1. During 2012, Victoria Group:
(1) received cash of $5,000 billed to a customer in 2011;
No affect
(2) earned $20,000 of net income;
No affect
(3) paid interest of $6,000 on a corporate bond issued;
No affect
(4) paid dividends of $8,000 to its stockholders;
Subtract $8,000
(5) borrowed $40,000 from a local bank; and
Add $40,000
(6) purchased its own shares of common stock for $10,000.
Subtract 10,000
What is Victoria Group’s cash flow from financing activities in 2012?
C. $22,000.

2. In preparing a statement of cash flows under the indirect method, an increase in accounts payable would be reported as a(n):
a. Addition to net income in the operating activities section.

3. Which of the following is NOT a correct practice when adjusting net income to net operating cash flows?
A. Subtract depreciation expense.
You would add depreciation expense.

4. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Investment in another company’s common stock is classified as a cash outflow from financing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.
False. Investing
b. Repayment of long-term debt is classified as a cash outflow from investing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.
False. Financing
c. Losses on the sale of long-term assets are an adjustment reported in the operating activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows under the indirect method.
True
d. Dividends paid are classified as a cash outflow from operating activities on the Statement of Cash Flows.
False. Financing

Mark asks…

The questions about Statement of Cash Flows (in Accounting)?

1. Nevada Boot Co. reported net income of $205,000 Beginning and ending Inventory balances were $40,000 and $45,000, respectively. Accounts Payable balances at the beginning and end of the year were $35,000 and $33,000, respectively. Assuming that all relevant information has been presented, Nevada Boot would report operating cash flows of:

a) $202,000.
b) $198,000.
c) $212,000.
d) $205,000.

2. During 2012, Victoria Group: (1) received cash of $5,000 billed to a customer in 2011; (2) earned $20,000 of net income; (3) paid interest of $6,000 on a corporate bond issued; (4) paid dividends of $8,000 to its stockholders; (5) borrowed $40,000 from a local bank; and (6) purchased its own shares of common stock for $10,000. What is Victoria Group’s cash flow from financing activities in 2012?

a) $40,000.
b) $30,000.
c) $22,000.
d) $16,000.

3. The balance sheet of Sound Designs reports total assets of $750,000 and $800,000 at the beginning and end of the year, respectively. Sales revenues are $1.5 million ($1.2 million in the previous year), net income is $150,000, and net cash flows from operating activities are $175,000. What is Sound Designs’ cash return on assets?

a) 19.4%.
b) 21.9%.
c) 22.6%.
d) 18.8%.

4. The balance sheet of Sound Designs reports total assets of $750,000 and $800,000 at the beginning and end of the year, respectively. Sales revenues are $1.5 million ($1.2 million in the previous year), net income is $150,000, and net cash flows from operating activities are $175,000. What is Sound Designs’ asset turnover?

a) 2.0 times.
b) 1.7 times.
c) 0.5 times.
4) 1.9 times.

Please help me.
Thank you for your help.

financi4 answers:

1. Take the net income and consider the effects the two events listed had. They have more inventory at the end of the year than the beginning, therefore they used $5,000 of cash from net income. Accounts payable went down from the beginning of the year, therefore they paid $2,000. Since both of those are increased uses of cash, thats net income of 205k – 2k – 5k equalling b, 198,000.

2. Here the question specifies financing activities.issuing stock, borrowing money, paying interest.
Borrowed 40k, paid 6k, paid 8k, purchased stock 10k. That equals16k, or C

3. I think you would divide net income by ending assets(instead of beginning), which results in d 18.8%. (actually since .20 isn’t an option that must be correct) 150000/800000

4. Asset turnover is generally assets divided by revenue. For these ratios you generally do not use beginning numbers. I would say 1,500,000/800,000 for 1.875 or 4) 1.9 times.
I’m pretty certain thats correct, but these are financial ratios, so make sure to double check your book, I’m sure there are a few charts in there that spell them all out for you.

John asks…

need help in critically analyzing this article. Don’t know what to write or how to do it?

A surprisingly weak jobs report cast a shadow over the economy, undermining several weeks of positive data and diluting hopes of an accelerating recovery.

U.S. employers added just 39,000 payroll jobs in November, a sharp slowdown from the prior month, the Labor Department said. The unemployment rate jumped to 9.8% from 9.6% in part due to more people joining the labor pool.

The report contradicted a recent string of optimistic data, from retail sales to housing, leading many analysts to suggest the figures could be a statistical aberration rather than the beginning of a weakening labor market. Indeed, the government on Friday revised jobs data for September and October to show stronger numbers in those months, though the rise was still far too slow to improve the labor picture substantially.

The latest figures underscore the fragility of the recovery more than a year after the economy resumed growth. Employers, while no longer cutting jobs on a large scale, remain cautious about substantial hiring amid weak, albeit improving, consumer sentiment. Private-sector employers added just 50,000 jobs last month, offsetting the 11,000 drop in government employment driven by local budget cuts.

The disappointing job report comes in the wake of a series of upbeat indicators, including signs that consumers were boosting spending in stores in the run-up to the holidays and a surging stock market.

Consumer sentiment — crucial in an economy where their spending accounts for 70% of demand — rose in November to its highest level since June. November auto sales jumped 17% from their year-earlier pace. In housing, an index of pending home sales surged more than 10% in October. Construction spending has increased for two months. Factory output and corporate profits continue to grow.

“The real world probably is not doing quite as poorly as these data suggest,” said Credit Suisse chief economist Neal Soss. “That is not to say the reality is satisfactory.”

The market rose slightly Friday, with the Dow up 19.68 to 11382.09. Oil hit another 25-month high. This week, other strong data and the anticipation of good jobs numbers pushed the Dow up nearly 300 points, to just below its high for the year.

Even Goldman Sachs economists, who have been among the most bearish forecasters in recent years, this week raised their projection for 2011 economic growth to 2.7% from 2% previously. But the firm still expects the unemployment rate to remain high, ending 2012 at 8.5%, following estimated growth of 3.6% that year.

“The economy is not sprinting, it’s not walking, but it’s crawling forward,” said Sam Geil, chief executive of Geil Enterprises, a Fresno, Calif., firm that provides janitorial and security services.

His company, with about 450 workers, has seen activity picking up since September and expanded payroll by 17 jobs last month. Mr. Geil said he’s noticed some people coming in as their unemployment benefits run dry. “It’s the lower-paying jobs,” Mr. Geil said. “We’re not adding at the higher level. We just don’t have the need.”

The numbers are likely to relieve some criticism of the Federal Reserve’s $600 billion bond-buying program, which central bank officials launched last month amid worries about a prolonged period of slow growth. The figures also increased the likelihood that Congress would extend tax cuts and federal unemployment benefits that expired this week, and perhaps consider new measures to boost growth, such as a payroll-tax holiday.

Rep. John Boehner (R., Ohio), the incoming House Speaker, said the weak job growth was “clearly no match for the uncertainty families and small businesses are facing, which is why we must cut spending and stop all the looming tax hikes.”

Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said terminating unemployment benefits or not extending middle-class tax cuts would “pull the rug out from under the nation’s recovery.”

The figures illustrate a divergence between sectors of the economy. Goods-producing sectors lost 15,000 jobs during the month due to declines in construction and manufacturing.

M-Tek Inc., an Elgin, Ill., builder of food packaging systems, says orders have been slow coming in. Rather than reduce its head count of 30 employees, the company has shifted staff according to need, says president Tom Liakopoulis.

Many service industries are seeing stronger activity and added 65,000 jobs overall in November. While the financial sector shed 9,000 jobs and the retail sector dropped by 28,000, every other major category saw an uptick.

Professional and business services gained 53,000 jobs; health care added 23,000. The leisure and hospitality industry, such as hotels, added about 11,000 jobs. W Austin hotel, which opens in Austin, Tex., next week, added 250 jobs last month, the bulk of the 315 it plans to br

financi4 answers:

Http://ca.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oG73K4pHJN6.UAaEzrFAx.?ei=UTF-8&fr=slv1-&p=how+to+write+a+critical+analysis&rs=0&fr2=rs-top

Daniel asks…

Prepare a statement of cash flows for the Crosby Corporation?

CROSBY CORPORATION
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,200,000
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,300,000
Gross profits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900,000
Selling and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420,000
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330,000
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,000
Earnings before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240,000
Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,000
6 days ago
Additional Details
CROSBY CORPORATION
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Earnings after taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,000
Preferred stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000
Earnings available to common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 150,000
Common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120,000
Earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.25
5 days ago

Statement of Retained Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Retained earnings, balance, January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500,000
Add: Earnings available to common stockholders, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . 150,000
Deduct: Cash dividends declared and paid in 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,000
Retained earnings, balance, December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $600,000
5 days ago

Comparative Balance Sheets
For 2007 and 2008
Year-End
2007
Year-End
2008
Assets
Current assets:
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70,000 $ 100,000
Accounts receivable (net) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000 350,000
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410,000 430,000
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,000 30,000
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830,000 910,000
Investments (long-term securities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,000 70,000
Plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000,000 2,400,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000,000 1,150,000
Net plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000,000 1,250,000
Total assets . .
5 days ago

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 250,000 $ 440,000
Notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000 400,000
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,000 50,000
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 720,000 890,000
Long-term liabilities:
Bonds payable, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,000 120,000
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 790,000 1,010,000
5 days ago
You can contact me at dannaslusser@yahoo.com

financi4 answers:

I’ve sent the file to the address above.

George asks…

is the american stock markets close early on the 25th , of april 2012 thanks?

bond markets do they close early and or markets early ….if amyone knows many tks

financi4 answers:

Maybe you are thinking of April 8th, which was Good Friday. The markets were closed for this holiday.

The next market holiday is Memorial Day, on May 28th (next Monday). It always comes on the last Monday of May.

Here is a list of market holidays.

Http://www.investmentu.com/nyse-holiday-schedule.html

Don’t make the same mistake I did and look at 2011 on this list by mistake (I had to edit my answer).

Powered by Yahoo! Answers